Ronald Carter - The Restoration did not so much restore as replace. In...

The Restoration did not so much restore as replace. In restoring the monarchy with King Charles II, it replaced Cromwell's Commonwealth and its Puritan ethos with an almost powerless monarch whose tastes had been formed in France. It replaced the power of the monarchy with the power of a parliamentary system - which was to develop into the two parties, Whigs and Tories - with most of the executive power in the hands of the Prime Minister. Both parties benefited from a system which encouraged social stability rather than opposition. Above all, in systems of thought, the Restoration replaced the probing, exploring, risk-taking intellectual values of the Renaissance. It relied on reason and on facts rather than on speculation. So, in the decades between 1660 and 1700, the basis was set for the growth of a new kind of society. This society was Protestant (apart from the brief reign of the Catholic King James II, 1685-88), middle class, and unthreatened by any repetition of the huge and traumatic upheavals of the first part of the seventeenth century. It is symptomatic that the overthrow of James II in 1688 was called The 'Glorious' or 'Bloodless' Revolution. The 'fever in the blood' which the Renaissance had allowed was now to be contained, subject to reason, and kept under control. With only the brief outburst of Jacobin revolutionary sentiment at the time of the Romantic poets, this was to be the political context in the United Kingdom for two centuries or more. In this context, the concentration of society was on commerce, on respectability, and on institutions. The 'genius of the nation' led to the founding of the Royal Society in 1662 - 'for the improving of Natural Knowledge'. The Royal Society represents the trend towards the institutionalisation of scientific investigation and research in this period. The other highly significant institution, one which was to have considerably more importance in the future, was the Bank of England, founded in 1694.

Ronald Carter

;
The Restoration did not so much restore as replace. In restoring the monarchy with King Charles II, it replaced Cromwell's Commonwealth and its Puritan ethos with an almost powerless monarch whose tastes had been formed in France. It replaced the power of the monarchy with the power of a parliamentary system - which was to develop into the two parties, Whigs and Tories - with most of the executive power in the hands of the Prime Minister. Both parties benefited from a system which encouraged social stability rather than opposition. Above all, in systems of thought, the Restoration replaced the probing, exploring, risk-taking intellectual values of the Renaissance. It relied on reason and on facts rather than on speculation. So, in the decades between 1660 and 1700, the basis was set for the growth of a new kind of society. This society was Protestant (apart from the brief reign of the Catholic King James II, 1685-88), middle class, and unthreatened by any repetition of the huge and traumatic upheavals of the first part of the seventeenth century. It is symptomatic that the overthrow of James II in 1688 was called The 'Glorious' or 'Bloodless' Revolution. The 'fever in the blood' which the Renaissance had allowed was now to be contained, subject to reason, and kept under control. With only the brief outburst of Jacobin revolutionary sentiment at the time of the Romantic poets, this was to be the political context in the United Kingdom for two centuries or more. In this context, the concentration of society was on commerce, on respectability, and on institutions. The 'genius of the nation' led to the founding of the Royal Society in 1662 - 'for the improving of Natural Knowledge'. The Royal Society represents the trend towards the institutionalisation of scientific investigation and research in this period. The other highly significant institution, one which was to have considerably more importance in the future, was the Bank of England, founded in 1694. Ronald Carter

Related Topics

Keywords

restoration restore replace restoring monarchy king charles ii replaced cromwell' commonwealth puritan ethos powerless monarch tastes formed france power parliamentary system - develop parties whigs tories executive hands prime minister benefited encouraged social stability opposition systems thought probing exploring risk-taking intellectual values renaissance relied reason facts speculation decades basis set growth kind society protestant reign catholic james 1685-88 middle class unthreatened repetition huge traumatic upheavals part seventeenth century symptomatic overthrow called 'glorious' 'bloodless' revolution 'fever blood' allowed contained subject control outburst jacobin revolutionary sentiment time romantic poets political context united kingdom centuries concentration commerce respectability institutions 'genius nation' led founding royal ' improving natural knowledge' represents trend institutionalisation scientific investigation research period highly significant institution considerably importance future bank england founded

Explore other Authors


If you are using this quote in any webpage , printmedia or any other places please use the following methods to cite this quotation.

MLA Style Citation
"A quote by Ronald Carter" theysaidso.com, 2024. Mar 29, 2024. https://theysaidso.com/quote/ronald-carter-the-restoration-did-not-so-much-restore-as-replace-in-restoring-th
APA Style Citation
"A quote by Ronald Carter" (n.d.). theysaidso.com. Retrieved Mar 29, 2024, from theysaidso.com web site : https://theysaidso.com/quote/ronald-carter-the-restoration-did-not-so-much-restore-as-replace-in-restoring-th
Chicago Style Citation
"A quote by Ronald Carter". theysaidso.com, 2024. https://theysaidso.com/quote/ronald-carter-the-restoration-did-not-so-much-restore-as-replace-in-restoring-th , accessed Mar 29, 2024.

Comments

Authentication required

You must log in to post a comment.

Log in

There are no comments yet.