Susan Sontag - Most of Arbus's work lies within the Warhol aesthetic, that...

Most of Arbus's work lies within the Warhol aesthetic, that is, defines itself in relation to the twin poles of boringness and freakishness; but it doesn't have the Warhol style. Arbus had neither Warhol's narcissism and genius for publicity nor the self-protective blandness with which he insulates himself from the freaky nor his sentimentality. It is unlikey that Warhol, who comes from a working-class family, ever felt any ambivalence toward success which afflicted the children of the Jewish upper middle classes in the 1960s. To someone raised as a Catholic, like Warhol (and virtually everyone in his gang), a fascination with evil comes much more genuinely than it does to someone from a Jewish background. Compared with Warhol, Arbus seems strikingly vulnerable, innocent--and certainly more pessimistic. Her Dantesque vision of the city (and the suburbs) has no reserves of irony. Although much of Arbus's material is the same as that depicted in, say, Warhol's (1966).. For Arbus, both freaks and Middle America were equally exotic: a boy marching in a pro-war parade and a Levittown housewife were as alien as a dwarf or a transvestite; lower-middle-class suburbia was as remote as Times Square, lunatic asylums, and gay bars. Arbus's work expressed her turn against what was public (as she experienced it), conventional, safe, reassuring--and boring--in favor of what was private, hidden, ugly, dangerous, and fascinating. These contrasts, now, seem almost quaint. What is safe no long monopolizes public imagery. The freakish is no longer a private zone, difficult of access. People who are bizarre, in sexual disgrace, emotionally vacant are seen daily on the newsstands, on TV, in the subways. Hobbesian man roams the streets, quite visible, with glitter in his hair.

Susan Sontag

;
Most of Arbus's work lies within the Warhol aesthetic, that is, defines itself in relation to the twin poles of boringness and freakishness; but it doesn't have the Warhol style. Arbus had neither Warhol's narcissism and genius for publicity nor the self-protective blandness with which he insulates himself from the freaky nor his sentimentality. It is unlikey that Warhol, who comes from a working-class family, ever felt any ambivalence toward success which afflicted the children of the Jewish upper middle classes in the 1960s. To someone raised as a Catholic, like Warhol (and virtually everyone in his gang), a fascination with evil comes much more genuinely than it does to someone from a Jewish background. Compared with Warhol, Arbus seems strikingly vulnerable, innocent--and certainly more pessimistic. Her Dantesque vision of the city (and the suburbs) has no reserves of irony. Although much of Arbus's material is the same as that depicted in, say, Warhol's (1966).. For Arbus, both freaks and Middle America were equally exotic: a boy marching in a pro-war parade and a Levittown housewife were as alien as a dwarf or a transvestite; lower-middle-class suburbia was as remote as Times Square, lunatic asylums, and gay bars. Arbus's work expressed her turn against what was public (as she experienced it), conventional, safe, reassuring--and boring--in favor of what was private, hidden, ugly, dangerous, and fascinating. These contrasts, now, seem almost quaint. What is safe no long monopolizes public imagery. The freakish is no longer a private zone, difficult of access. People who are bizarre, in sexual disgrace, emotionally vacant are seen daily on the newsstands, on TV, in the subways. Hobbesian man roams the streets, quite visible, with glitter in his hair. Susan Sontag

Related Topics

Keywords

arbus' work lies warhol aesthetic defines relation twin poles boringness freakishness style arbus warhol' narcissism genius publicity -protective blandness insulates freaky sentimentality unlikey working-class family felt ambivalence success afflicted children jewish upper middle classes 1960s raised catholic virtually gang fascination evil genuinely background compared strikingly vulnerable innocent-- pessimistic dantesque vision city suburbs reserves irony material depicted freaks america equally exotic boy marching pro-war parade levittown housewife alien dwarf transvestite lower-middle-class suburbia remote times square lunatic asylums gay bars expressed turn public experienced conventional safe reassuring-- boring-- favor private hidden ugly dangerous fascinating contrasts quaint long monopolizes imagery freakish longer zone difficult access people bizarre sexual disgrace emotionally vacant daily newsstands tv subways hobbesian man roams streets visible glitter hair

Explore other Authors


If you are using this quote in any webpage , printmedia or any other places please use the following methods to cite this quotation.

MLA Style Citation
"A quote by Susan Sontag" theysaidso.com, 2024. Apr 20, 2024. https://theysaidso.com/quote/susan-sontag-most-of-arbuss-work-lies-within-the-warhol-aesthetic-that-is-define
APA Style Citation
"A quote by Susan Sontag" (n.d.). theysaidso.com. Retrieved Apr 20, 2024, from theysaidso.com web site : https://theysaidso.com/quote/susan-sontag-most-of-arbuss-work-lies-within-the-warhol-aesthetic-that-is-define
Chicago Style Citation
"A quote by Susan Sontag". theysaidso.com, 2024. https://theysaidso.com/quote/susan-sontag-most-of-arbuss-work-lies-within-the-warhol-aesthetic-that-is-define , accessed Apr 20, 2024.

Comments

Authentication required

You must log in to post a comment.

Log in

There are no comments yet.