My husband called from work; I had just gotten up. When he told me what happened I turned on the television and watched it most of the day. It was so unbelievable
There was a lack of traveling, but the people who were traveling were in family groups. There was a feeling that families had to be together. We even got our family together that night
I worry about terrorists taking advantage of us when we are feeling down
If we're both doing our job very well, it's natural to have overlap in our stories
We wanted to have a quiet launch to work out the kinks beforehand
We would map out all the people, the clients and management and lower down in the company, find out who was for us and who was against us
My job was to manage that network of people and -- if people couldn't be convinced to support us -- to take them out, as people who could stop us from selling our project.
The expert who the client will have seen when the project was sold will tend to only visit most projects occasionally, and often they will be spending their time out selling new projects
I went, 'Oh, this is not right,' then I started investigating it.
The knowledge of the delayed function of a cashier's check and a money order might catch some people if they were nice honest people.
John Hodgson can describe Richard Dawkins's atheism as vacuous only because 'atheist' is a term which non-believers use purely as a polemical convenience when we have to define concisely what we don't believe [...]. No atheist is principally that. What we'd want to call ourselves is humanist or materialist, or biologist or linguist, or for that matter socialist, because one or more of these, or something else again, is what we do and think and are. We have 'purely and simply finished with God', to adapt a phrase of Engels's.
atheismatheistsbiologistsfriedrich-engelsgodhumanistsjohn-hodgsonlinguistslrbmaterialistsreligionrichard-dawkinsself-conceptsocialists