Jane Austen's narrative style seems to me to show (especially in the later novels) a curiously chameleon-like faculty; it varies in colour as the habits of expression of the several characters impress themselves on the relation of the episode in which they are involved, and on the description of their situations.
Mary Lascelles
As for Elizabeth Bennet, our chief reason for accepting her point of view as a reflection of her author's is the impression that she bears of sympathy between them--an impression of which almost every reader would be sensible, even if it had not the explicit confirmation of Jane Austen's letters. Yet, as she is presented to us in Pride and Prejudice, she is but a partial and sometimes perverse observer.
jane-austen pride-and-prejudice elizabeth-bennet
In Jane Austen it was the critical faculty that would not be quieted; and that faculty in her, played on men and women.
jane-austen
Charlotte Palmer is no sillier than Harriet Smith; and yet, how intolerable we should find it to see and hear as much of Charlotte as we do of Harriet! And would Miss Bates have been endurable if she had been presented in the mood and manners of Sense and Sensibility?
jane-austen emma
Others beside Jane Austen have made their Eltons, though none quite so cooly as she.
Sympathy compounded of liking and compassion in varying proportions evidently seemed to Jane Austen the most natural inventive to imaginative interest in a character.
The sole agents, indeed, in the action of her novels are individual human beings. And the comedy is the outcome of their making fools of themselves and of one another.
Few novelists can be more scrupulous than Jane Austen as to the phrasing of the thoughts of their characters.
Jane Austen never repeats herself.
You must log in to post a comment.
There are no comments yet.