In any architecture, there is an equity between the pragmatic function and the symbolic function.
I don't care what people call me,labels have the negative value of making smaller boundaries for people.
The dialogue of architecture has been centered too long around the idea of truth.
I have no requirements for a style of architecture.
I see architecture not as Gropius did, as a moral venture, as truth, but as invention, in the same way that poetry or music or painting is invention.
As an architect I've always believed that what can make a domestic setting truly home is the infusion of a cultural dimension.
It was always my goal to 'up the ante' on good design and rye devoted much of my career to this.
If I have a style, I am not aware of it.
In designing hardware to be used every day, it was important to keep both the human aspects and the machine in mind. What looks good also often feels good.
I have a requirement for myself in making designations of elements. I need to have full language and I do not want the language to be only space.
I don't care what people call me, labels have the negative value of making smaller boundaries for people.
I don't believe in morality in architecture.