This was an unfortunate decision based on false fears. These people want to censor information from students.
Casey Luskin
This may be just episode one.
It's very significant for the students of Kansas. Instead of just the evidence that supports evolution, they're going to see all sides.
evolution students evidence
In my opinion, this decision is unconstitutional. The government has no business telling people how they should perceive evolution and religion.
evolution people government business religion decision opinion
In the larger debate over intelligent design, this decision will be of minor significance. As we've repeatedly stressed, the ultimate validity of intelligent design will be determined not by the courts but by the scientific evidence pointing to design.
design determined debate decision significance evidence ultimate intelligent courts
Students will learn more about evolution, not less as some Darwinists have falsely claimed.
evolution learn students
We believe evolution should be taught as a scientific theory that is open to critical scrutiny, not as a sacred dogma that can't be questioned.
evolution critical open dogma sacred theory scrutiny
information people fears decision false students
Currently there are propaganda efforts underway by Darwinists to try and persuade people into thinking promoting critical thinking about evolution is somehow bad for students and science education.
evolution people science education bad propaganda critical thinking students
Darwin-only lobbyists are trying to bully the Ohio State Board of Education into pulling a lesson plan that was created by a science advisory committee that included teachers, science educators, and scientists from across the state simply because it presents some of the scientific evidence that challenges Darwinian evolution. Students should learn more about evolution, not less, including the theory's strength and weaknesses.
strength evolution science education teachers challenges plan learn lesson state scientists students evidence bully
The ruling in Dover banning intelligent design clearly has no relevance for Ohio. Ohio is not teaching intelligent design, making this a completely different issue. That was merely a ploy for Darwinists to keep students from learning about the evidence challenging Darwin's theory.
design learning teaching theory students evidence intelligent challenging
You must log in to post a comment.
There are no comments yet.