The only thing I can say is that it's unjustifiable and inconceivable to think that fairness is achieved by punishing an individual three different times for the same offense. The decision is so outrageous. In 20 years as an attorney, I've never read a more favorable decision about the losing party than what was written by the arbitration panel.
Seth Levinson
fairness decision individual times losing party offense read written thing
This isn't a demand. It's simply a respectful request to satisfy his desire to be closer to home.
home desire closer demand
You must log in to post a comment.
There are no comments yet.